Saturday, January 10, 2026

The Ancestors of Martha's Vineyard II: the Immigrant Henry Luce

 
Dr. Charles Banks was an authority on Martha's Vineyard and its residents. His three-volume series, The history of Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County, Massachusetts, published between 1911 and 1925, was the result of twenty years of research and writing. The volumes contain a wealth of information about the history of the island and its residents. The quote below was taken from the third volume. It refers to my 9th great-grandfather, Henry Luce, the progenitor of the Luce family in Colonial New England. 
   

− ORIGINS –
 
Henry Luce I (1640-1687)
Remember Litchfield (1644-1708)
maternal 9th great-grandparents
                                                               
Unfortunately, Banks wasn't wrong. Finding information about Henry has been a challenge. Little is known about his early life or what circumstances motivated him to make the long voyage across the Atlantic to the New England colonies. The lack of information also extends to his children and other descendants.  
 
Henry, the immigrant ancestor in our Luce line, arrived in Plymouth Colony in the early 1660s. Neither his origin nor the exact year of his arrival is clear. Some sources say Henry was from Gloucester, England, while others claim he was from Wales. There are valid arguments for both. 
 
An informal study done in 1990 (Swanström) found the surname Luce in only two places: the Isle of Jersey in the Channel Islands and in southwestern England north and northeast of Bristol. In that study, the Jersey Islanders were ruled out as Henry's possible forebears, since members of that group appear to have emigrated to Canada. 
On the other hand, Gloucester is about 20 miles from the River Wye (pronounced "why") 
which forms the southern part of the border between Wales and England. It seems reasonable to say Henry was from that region, even though the exact location has not been determined.  
 
Map of Wales-England Border. (Wikimedia Commons - User:DankJae CC BY-SA 4.0)

 THE ELUSIVE HENRY LUCE I  
  
The first record of Henry is found in Scituate, Plymouth Colony where his name is recorded as a juror on November 13, 1666. There are no records of his marriage to Remember Litchfield, but it probably took place in Scituate in 1666, since their first child, Robert, my 8th great-grandfather, was born there in 1667. Remember, my 8th great-grandmother, was born November 16, 1668, in Rehoboth, Plymouth Colony where Henry had purchased land. Finally, Henry purchased a home lot on Martha’s Vineyard on February 1, 1671. 
 
Eight more children were born there — all boys:    
 
Israel (1671-1727), Experience (1673-1747), Eleazer (1675-1740), Henry II (1677-unk), Thomas (1679-1727), William (1681-1734), David (1683-1752), and Josiah (1685-1748).
 
Henry's home lot was located on the west side of Old Mill River (now called Mill Brook), about forty rods (220 ft) north of Scotchman's Bridge Road (now Scotchmans Lane). There is still a house there that is the same distance from the road as Henry’s.
 
(Google map with added labeling)
 
In addition to his home lot, Henry owned land in Kuppiegon (now Cape Higgon), 60 acres in Christian Town bordering James Pond, and at Great Neck (location unknown). The family bought, sold, and transferred land among themselves, as well as with other island residents. 
 
Henry Luce's property locations on Martha's Vineyard. (Google maps with added locations)
 
− THE PURCHASE & SETTLEMENT OF MARTHA’S VINEYARD –
 
Thomas Mayhew, Sr., a merchant and Puritan, was originally from Tisbury in Wiltshire County, England. Thomas, his wife, Abigail (Anna) Parkhurst, and son, Thomas, Jr. arrived in New England with Winthrop’s fleet of 1630. The family settled in Watertown about six miles west of Boston. In 1641, while Mayhew was doing business near Boston, he learned about Nantucket, the Elizabeth Islands, and Martha’s Vineyard. All the islands were owned by William Alexander, Earl of Sterling who had been granted a charter by King Charles I. Thomas, Sr. purchased the islands for a price of £40 (about $11,630 in 2025) and two beaver hats. Not long after this, Mayhew sold Nantucket and the Elizabeth Islands. 
 
 
Thomas, Sr. intended to live on Martha’s Vineyard, home to approximately 3,000 Wampanoag who were the first inhabitants of the island over 10,000 ago before. But first he sent his son, Thomas, Jr., to establish a settlement. Thomas, Jr. and about a dozen families founded Edgartown in 1642. That same year, his father appointed himself governor of the island. It was a harbinger of things to come.
 

Thomas, Jr. learned the Wampanoag language, and became a successful missionary to the tribe. The Wampanoag and the English lived in peace due to Thomas, Jr.’s ministry and his father’s fairness when purchasing parcels of Wampanoag land. In 1657, Mayhew sent Thomas, Jr., who was about 37, to England on business. After its departure, the ship and all that were aboard were never seen again. It was a tremendous loss for Thomas, Sr. He then turned to his grandson, Matthew Mayhew, to assist him in managing the affairs of the Vineyard.

 
 THE SEEDS OF DISCONTENT –
 

Martha’s Vineyard had been loosely under the jurisdiction of Massachusetts Bay Colony, given that it was somewhat remote. Consequently, the self-proclaimed governor had experienced little oversight. He was able to establish what would be a long-lived, self-serving Vineyard government. Through the years, Mayhew surrounded himself with family members who would support his policies in the affairs of the island. They were not beneficial to the general population of settlers, but there was no one to challenge his authority.

 

When the English took Manhattan from the Dutch in 1664, King Charles II included Martha’s Vineyard in lands he gave to his brother, James, the Duke of York. Thomas Mayhew became concerned  he did not want his authority challenged. Did Massachu-setts still have authority over the Vineyard or was it now New York and, if so, how would that affect him?

In 1671, Mayhew traveled to New York to meet with New York’s Governor Francis Lovelace. A settlement was reached that left Thomas Mayhew in a very good place. Martha’s Vineyard was now under the jurisdiction of the Province of New York. It was farther away than Massachusetts, so Mayhew expected there would be little oversight due to the distance. Even better, Governor Lovelace named Thomas Mayhew “Governor for Life” of Martha’s Vineyard. Mayhew did not waste any time beginning to wield his newly enhanced power. But there would be repercussions. This arrangement had few supporters outside the Mayhew family.
 

When Henry Luce and his family arrived on Martha’s Vineyard in 1671, there were about 40 individual families, including Thomas Mayhew and his extended family. Henry soon became aware of the tension between the settlers and the Mayhews.  
 
The settlers, some of whom had been on the island since the beginning, had many grievances, including
  • a tax collection agency packed with members of the Mayhew family, 
  • unfair trials because the court was filled with Mayhew family members, 
  • no elections because Mayhew was now “Governor for Life” on Martha's Vineyard, 
  • some residents paying a disproportionate share of taxes without having any say in the government, 
  • a feudal system where landowners were required to pay rent on their own properties because they happened to be within the bounds of Thomas Mayhew's newly created Tisbury Manor. 
Needless to say, the majority of Islanders were incensed. 
 
Then, in August 1673, the Dutch regained control of New York. 
 
− A WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY –

After the Dutch seizure of New York, it was unclear if Massachusetts had jurisdiction over the Vineyard. The majority of Vineyard landowners, led by Simon Athearn, decided to use the situation as an opportunity to take action. A letter authored by Thomas Burchard was sent to 80-year-old Thomas Mayhew, politely requesting that he step down and allow an election. They even guaranteed that he would be reelected, but that subsequent elections would take place. It was signed by twenty men, including Henry Luce. (Banks, v.1, 156)

Thomas Mayhew flatly refused. 

The signature of Henery Luce. (Banks, v. 2, 54

The twenty men who signed the Thomas Mayhew letter. (Banks, v.1, 158)
 
On October 15, Simon Athearn and Thomas Burchard sent a petition signed by the same twenty men to Massachusetts Governor John Leverett in the hope that he could help them. Governor Leverett, not wanting to insert himself in the contentious matter, turned them down.
 
− THE “DUTCH” REBELLION of 1673 –

 

Even though Henry Luce had been on the island for only two years, it was clear that the governance was not what he or other residents wanted. The settlers of Martha’s Vineyard had been guaranteed certain freedoms and rights in Thomas Mayhew's original 1641 purchase agreement with the Earl of Sterling  Mayhew was ignoring them.

 

Per the original agreement, if Mayhew founded a new colony, which he had, he was bound by the terms of that agreement, specifically, “… it is agreed that the government that the said Thomas Mayhew and Thomas Mayhew his son and their associates shall set up shall be such as is now established in the Massachusetts aforesaid.” (Banks, v.1, 82

 

[The Massachusetts government allowed only Puritan men who were church members and owned property to vote for the governor and representatives to the General Court. While restrictive, it did allow a segment of the citizens to take part in the selection of their leaders.]

 

When guaranteed freedoms are taken away by someone whose goal is to have complete control, resistance or outright rebellion become the only options. The disgruntled, disgusted citizens formed their own government. It was short-lived. In November 1674, the English regained control of New York and Thomas Mayhew was once again backed by the Governor of New York.

 

− THE AFTERMATH –
 
The vengeful, elderly Thomas Mayhew (1593-1682), Governor for Life of Martha’s Vineyard and Lord of Tisbury Manor, levied fines and made arrests. Some of the petitioners left the island permanently. Simon Athearn, in particular, paid dearly as the main instigator of the rebellion. 
 
Whether Henry Luce suffered significantly under the Mayhew regime is unknown. It’s possible he did not endure the heavy fines and other punitive measures imposed upon Simon Athearn, Thomas Burchard, the Nortons, and others for two reasons. Henry was a relative newcomer on the Vineyard and did not have an extensive history with the Mayhews. Also, Henry’s daughter, Remember, was related to the Mayhews by marriage. She was the daughter-in-law of Thomas Mayhew’s niece, Elizabeth Parkhurst Merry. 
 
[Elizabeth's husband, Joseph Merry, was one of the 19 men who did not sign the petition to Governor Leverett. Elizabeth and Joseph are my 8th great-grandparents. See the October 27, 2025 post, The Ancestors of Martha's Vineyard I: the Merry Family.] 
 
Thomas Mayhew died in 1682. He was succeeded by his equally oppressive grandson, Matthew Mayhew. In reference to the Athearns, Charles Banks wrote that, “for the remaining years of their lives it was a vendetta that knew no surcease”. The Mayhew-Athearn feud would continue for generations.   
 
Even under the continued Mayhew regime, Henry served as surveyor of highways in 1675, juror in 1677 and 1681, and a selectman in 1687. He died sometime between February 3, 1687, the date of his last land transaction, and March 12, 1689, when his wife, Remember, purchased land in her own name.
 
The rule of the Mayhew family ended when a new charter under King William III and Queen Mary II took effect in 1692. It directed the Province of New York to cede Martha's Vineyard to the Province of Massachusetts Bay. Fifty years of Mayhew oppression was over. 
 
Descendants of Henry Luce and Remember Litchfield still live on Martha's Vineyard. 

*               *               *

− FURTHER READING –

 

“Yellacat Ranch: A genealogical journal” is a blog written by Justin (Howery) Durand, a descendant of Henry Luce. The posts include findings in a Luce yDNA project and other details. https://www.yellacatranch.com/luce/

 

*               *               * 

− SOURCES −

Banks, Charles E. The History of Martha’s Vineyard, Duke’s County, Massachusetts, Vol I. Boston: G.H. Dean, 1911. Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/historyofmarthas01bank/page/n8/mode/1up

 

Banks, Charles E. The History of Martha’s Vineyard, Duke’s County, Massachusetts, Vol II. Boston: George H. Dean, 1911. Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/historyofmarthas02bank/page/n12/mode/ 
 
Banks, Charles E. The History of Martha’s Vineyard, Duke’s County, Massachusetts, Vol III (1931). Edgartown: Dukes County Historical Society, 1925. Google Books https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89067299883&seq=26
 
Jackson, B. Darrell. “The Family of Henry and Remember Luce of Martha’s Vineyard,” The New England Historical and Genealogical Register 177 (Summer 2023):245-257.

 

McCourt, Martha F. The American descendants of Henry Luce of Martha’s Vineyard. Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1994. Internet Archive. www.archive.org
 
Norton, Henry Franklin. Martha’s Vineyard. by Henry Franklin Norton and Robert Emmett Pyne, Publishers, 1923. http://history.vineyard.net/hfnorton/history.htm
Swanström, Justin. The English Origin of Henry Luce, (1989, 2006). Yellacat Ranch: A genealogical journal https://www.yellacatranch.com/about/
  

*               *               *

 
 

Bradish-Scott Family History  January 2026